From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mead Subject: Re: More conspicous header lines Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:01:18 +0100 Message-ID: <877hxz22ox.fsf@gmail.com> References: <877hy09xjw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87hbx3n6ci.fsf@gmail.com> <87ocrb4wn8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTuBL-0003fx-2O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:01:43 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTuBG-0003ee-GR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:01:42 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50476 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MTuBG-0003eW-47 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:01:38 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:46698 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MTuBE-0001xD-WC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:01:37 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MTuBA-00061q-QS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:01:32 +0000 Received: from cpc3-rdng14-0-0-cust786.winn.cable.ntl.com ([82.0.211.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:01:32 +0000 Received: from paul.d.mead by cpc3-rdng14-0-0-cust786.winn.cable.ntl.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:01:32 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > Paul Mead writes: > >> Bastien writes: >> >>> >>> Please people vote. It's a tiny change but since we all have different >>> preferences for such things, it's good to have a sense of what everyone >>> thinks... >> >> What are we voting for, to make this *possible* or *default*? > > Default. OK, I don't personally like the look of it, so I'd probably turn it off, so assuming that's an option, why not?