From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Niels Felsted Thorsen Subject: Re: POLL: Change of keys to move agenda through time Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:05:27 +0200 Message-ID: <877hwstaq0.fsf@tsuga.lan> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MfyRP-0005uq-CL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:00:11 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MfyRK-0005re-IE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:00:10 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35779 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MfyRK-0005rW-BD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:00:06 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:32784) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MfyRJ-0000eA-JQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:00:06 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MfyRH-0004GK-Bz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:00:03 +0200 Received: from 51.84-49-97.nextgentel.com ([84.49.97.51]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:00:03 +0200 Received: from nift by 51.84-49-97.nextgentel.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:00:03 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik writes: > we have the proposal to do the following key changes in the agenda: > > 1. Make the cursor keys LEFT and RIGHT do normal cursor motion again > 2. Use the keys "n" and "p" to switch the agenda to earlier > and later dates. > > I would like to call a vote on this issue. Please weigh in. > Should we make this change? yes or no? no