From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Re: How to get \\ in title or author? Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:33:07 +0800 Message-ID: <877hwadsb0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87ocpmc3mk.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87tyze4c7b.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87eiqhc1tt.fsf@mundaneum.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mkx4p-0004S3-MW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 05:33:27 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mkx4j-0004Gb-V4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 05:33:26 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51989 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mkx4j-0004Ft-6g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 05:33:21 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f220.google.com ([209.85.218.220]:60823) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mkx4i-0003SV-FD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 05:33:20 -0400 Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so431086bwz.42 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 02:33:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87eiqhc1tt.fsf@mundaneum.com> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22S=E9bastien?= Vauban"'s message of "Tue, 08 Sep 2009 09:50:22 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien?= Vauban Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Sébastien Vauban writes: > #+TITLE: Main title \linebreak Subtitle > #+AUTHOR: Main author \linebreak Second one > > DOES WORK. Thanks for your precious help! > > I'm not sure to understand the subtle differences between `\\', `\newline' and > `\linebreak', though... Me neither :) I've found this, which might help: http://www.personal.ceu.hu/tex/breaking.htm Maybe \linebreak is less context-sensitive than \newline, which would mean that there are more contexts (like \title and \author) in which it behaves as expected. Just a guess. -- Bastien