From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Org now fontifies code blocks Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 18:30:23 +0200 Message-ID: <877hiwb3kw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8739uvw0hg.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> <87vd7j1nck.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> <87lj7kqh3f.fsf_-_@stats.ox.ac.uk> <874oe6pwew.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> <87mxrug1x9.fsf@gnu.org> <87sk1lmzyo.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> <878w3dxzo0.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60287 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OtNXW-0002v6-MQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:30:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OtNXT-0004cz-K8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:30:26 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:58000) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OtNXT-0004cN-G8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:30:23 -0400 Received: by wyb36 with SMTP id 36so269270wyb.0 for ; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:30:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878w3dxzo0.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> (Dan Davison's message of "Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:54:07 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Dan Davison Cc: Richard Riley , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Dan Davison writes: > (We badly need a customize group for these org-src but non-babel > variables[1]. That suggests to me subsuming the "Babel" group (Should be > "Org Babel" for consistency?) within a new group, perhaps "Org Code" or > "Org Src" or "Org Source Code" ? Views? I find "Org Code" and "Org Source Code" rather ambiguous. "Org Src" is better but still a bit too general IMHO. "Org Src Block"? -- Bastien