From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] org-display-inline-images to reduce image size Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 09:33:32 +0100 Message-ID: <877hdc1bxf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <48E592E3.5040208@gmx.de> <170f0450810061950k6bbb5773nd1d1fcb024fd35a1@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40801 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PmMXM-00079T-G4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 03:33:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PmMXJ-0007Rc-KG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 03:33:32 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:43203) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PmMXJ-0007RR-8x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 03:33:29 -0500 Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so4436833wwb.30 for ; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 00:33:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Vladimir Alexiev's message of "Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:31:17 +0000 (UTC)") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Vladimir Alexiev Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Vladimir, Vladimir Alexiev writes: > How to avoid line breakage in the patch? Better to use plain text emails from your client - sending from gmane will result in messing up long lines. > Some source lines are naturally >80 chars and I wouldn't like to shorten them. > I posted from the web (http://post.gmane.org/post.php?group=gmane.emacs.orgmode) > I guess I should get an account and post from a real mail client? > > Furthermore, the "Comments" at the patchwork server > (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/526/) > mess up the patch, though the patch itself is ok > (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/526/raw/) I downloaded the patch and lines are not well wrapped - they are wrapped the way patchwork displays it. Could you resubmit your patch? I'm willing to test it. Thanks! -- Bastien