From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [babel] using #+call for inline results
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:11:50 +0100
Message-ID: <877h8b7int.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <87mxhaunsi.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87mxh9omwb.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87mxh9pvz8.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87sjr1i040.fsf@gmail.com>
	<874o3hvuh0.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87sjr0psih.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87r56k78wm.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <871uykgw62.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41894)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1Qa1Ua-0004Y2-7y
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 04:11:57 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1Qa1UZ-0000hC-7I
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 04:11:56 -0400
Received: from vscane-a2.ucl.ac.uk ([144.82.108.42]:43660)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1Qa1UZ-0000h8-0Y
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 04:11:55 -0400
In-Reply-To: <871uykgw62.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Thu, 23
	Jun 2011 21:55:17 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:

> Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> writes:
>
>>> I see no difference between the paragraph and the list item: in both
>>> cases, the table doesn't appear, as it has been moved right after the
>>> headline by `org-export-blocks-preprocess' during export.
>>>
>>> Are we observing the same phenomenon?
>>
>> No, I don't believe so.  Nothing to do with the table; all to do with
>> the two inline babel evaluations.  The latex I get exported by this
>> snippet of org code:
>>
>>   The relative volatility is src_octave[:var it=benzene-chlorobenzene-relative-volatility :results output raw]{disp(it);}.
>>
>>   If I put the result in a list:
>>   - it does not work as the result is src_octave[:var it=benzene-chlorobenzene-relative-volatility :results output raw]{disp(it);} and the list processing is confused.
>>
>> is
>>
>>   The relative volatility is   7.8578
>> .
>>
>>   If I put the result in a list:
>>
>> \begin{itemize}
>> \item it does not work as the result is   7.8578
>> \end{itemize}
>>  and the list processing is confused.
>> ORG-LIST-END-MARKER
>
> Again, we get different outputs. *sighs*

Interesting.  What do you get?


[...]

> Well, all this babbling doesn't quite help to solve the issue at
> hand...

but thanks for the explanation: the processing is sort of what I
expected you were having to do.  Please don't worry too much about this
particular use case as it is not critical!

Thanks again,
eric
-- 
: Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.50.1
: using Org-mode version 7.5 (release_7.5.418.ge860.dirty)