From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Schulte Subject: Re: [babel] BUG in :session Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 06:23:53 -0600 Message-ID: <877h4vxzja.fsf@gmail.com> References: <4E79C82A.9000809@gmail.com> <878vpidj5d.fsf@gmail.com> <87hb45d73i.fsf@gmail.com> <80ty85hd3l.fsf@somewhere.org> <87pqitco2i.fsf@gmail.com> <87r537i6zb.fsf@gmail.com> <804o02ucpk.fsf@somewhere.org> <80r533rb5q.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55797) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R8AEb-0003zn-Hn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 08:24:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R8AEV-0002cc-LV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 08:24:33 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.213.41]:56885) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R8AEV-0002cN-GH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 08:24:27 -0400 Received: by ywe9 with SMTP id 9so5017012ywe.0 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 05:24:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <80r533rb5q.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:54:41 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > Hi Martyn and Eric, > > Martyn Jago wrote: >> "Sebastien Vauban" >> writes: >>> Martyn Jago wrote: >>>> Eric Schulte writes: >>>>> Martyn Jago writes: >>>>>> Unfortunately this is still broken for me. Given the exe exists but = the >>>>>> feature doesn't (ie no personal config), the following line causes t= he >>>>>> error `peculiar error' ! >>>>>> >>>>>> (signal 'org-test-lib-not-found "ess")) >>> >>> FYI, same for me, with the "batch tests", on a git update'd copy done 2= mins >>> ago. >>> >>> #+begin_src sh >>> emacs -Q --batch -l "/cygdrive/c/Program >>> Files/Emacs-24.0/lisp/emacs-lisp/ert.el" -l "/cygdrive/c/Program >>> Files/Emacs-24.0/lisp/emacs-lisp/ert-x.el" -l >>> ~/src/org-mode/testing/org-test.el --eval "(setq org-confirm-babel-eval= uate >>> nil)" -f org-test-run-batch-tests >>> #+end_src >>> >>> #+results: >>> OVERVIEW >>> Loading vc-git... >>> OVERVIEW >>> OVERVIEW >>> OVERVIEW >>> OVERVIEW >>> OVERVIEW >>> OVERVIEW >>> OVERVIEW >>> OVERVIEW >>> OVERVIEW >>> OVERVIEW >>> OVERVIEW >>> Loading /cygdrive/c/home/sva/src/org-mode/testing/lisp/test-ob-R.el (so= urce)... >>> peculiar error > > Just git pull'ed, and re-tested: > > =E2=94=8F=E2=94=81=E2=94=81=E2=94=81=E2=94=81 > =E2=94=83 Ran 111 tests, 104 results as expected, 7 unexpected (2011-= 09-26 08:20:06+0200) > =E2=94=83=20 > =E2=94=83 7 unexpected results: > =E2=94=83 FAILED ob-fortran/command-arguments > =E2=94=83 FAILED ob-fortran/fortran-var-program > =E2=94=83 FAILED ob-fortran/input-var > =E2=94=83 FAILED ob-fortran/list-var > =E2=94=83 FAILED ob-fortran/list-var-from-table > =E2=94=83 FAILED ob-fortran/preprosessor-var > =E2=94=83 FAILED ob-fortran/simple-program > =E2=94=97=E2=94=81=E2=94=81=E2=94=81=E2=94=81 > > "Normal", I don't have any fortran installed. Maybe, some sort of protect= ion > should have to be applied to these too. > I've just improved the code which checks for executables as the previous version was probably linux-specific. The following should now throw an error on your system which should inhibit loading of the fortran tests. (org-test-for-executable "gfortran") > >>> This is on Windows XP SP3, with a Cygwin Emacs (when run from terminal; >>> otherwise, it is a Win32 binary from the FSF). >> >> Its really great to hear you are running the tests on Windows. At some >> point I hope to test with the EmacsW32 port. > > I can do it as well. I should automate this -- not difficult, though. > > If there is some shared place to place such results, I can imagine running > them every couple of hours (cron'ed), or so, and publish the resulting HT= ML. I > could do this when being online, that is more or less half of the time. > This sounds great. I agree that a public place to post results would be useful. Also, while we don't have any HTML export right now, simply redirecting the results of the test execution to a file should be sufficient. Cheers -- Eric > > Best regards, > Seb --=20 Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/