From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Yearly repeats on the agenda Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:46:34 +0200 Message-ID: <877gxawoyd.fsf@altern.org> References: <1890.1334665342@alphaville> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34900) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLDDO-0008SI-N2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:45:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLDDJ-0002ux-H2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:45:30 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:37336) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLDDJ-0002uh-80 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:45:25 -0400 Received: by wibhj13 with SMTP id hj13so466832wib.12 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 05:45:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1890.1334665342@alphaville> (Nick Dokos's message of "Tue, 17 Apr 2012 08:22:22 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, SW Hi Nick, Nick Dokos writes: > so it becomes "<2012-04-17.*?>". Hence it removes the date in the third > example above, but not in the other two. > > The question is whether this is intended or not I think this is intended. If timestamps were not removed from today's date, agenda listing items scheduled/timestamped for today would be less readable. -- Bastien