From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: unintended strike-through in table Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:35:32 +0100 Message-ID: <877gx9jgp7.fsf@pank.eu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40233) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLbLy-00068v-Jo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:31:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLbLu-0002oU-LQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:31:58 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38164) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLbLu-0002oI-F5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:31:54 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SLbLr-0001w3-Hk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 16:31:51 +0200 Received: from client-86-25-187-101.bsh-bng-011.adsl.virginmedia.net ([86.25.187.101]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 16:31:51 +0200 Received: from rasmus by client-86-25-187-101.bsh-bng-011.adsl.virginmedia.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 16:31:51 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Skip Collins writes: > I do not believe this is intended behavior for +strike-through+ text. > The + symbol serves triple duty in org syntax as a an indicator for > +stricken words+, a line drawing symbol in tables, and a #+keyword > prefix. It can also be an item which is a problem with LaTeX math. Example: \begin{equation} x + y wv - z \end{equation} is translated to \begin{equation} x \begin{itemize} \item y \end{itemize} wv \begin{itemize} \item z \end{itemize} \end{equation} I guess one could wrap it in #+begin_latex · #+end_latex, but that would be cubersome. –Rasmus -- In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice they are not