From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Question about HTML export, drawers, and links Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:21:20 +0200 Message-ID: <877grn4a9r.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87d31icmar.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <871uhyf9xn.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41022) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TF5yq-0007vg-0Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:21:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TF5yl-0008Tm-Qn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:21:27 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:41943) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TF5yl-0008TL-K4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:21:23 -0400 Received: by wibhn17 with SMTP id hn17so1792679wib.12 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:21:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <871uhyf9xn.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:56:20 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Thomas Moyer , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> Thomas Moyer writes: >> >>> I have a set of files that I put notes in that I would like to export >>> to HTML. When I do this, I have configured everything to allow >>> certain drawers to included in the export, but those drawers are put >>> in
 blocks. Is there a way to convince the export mechanism to
>>> treat links inside drawers as links that need exported. I put a link
>>> in the drawer to another file and would like the link to work.
>>
>> This is not currently possible.
>>
>> The new HTML exporter (contrib/lisp/org-e-html.el) supports using a
>> custom function to export drawers.  It is not easily usable for now, 
>> but maybe you can explore from there.
>
> AFAIU, the new exporter defaults to what the OP is asking for.

Indeed, thanks for double-checking.

-- 
 Bastien