From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: New exporter, beamer confusion Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:58:42 +0100 Message-ID: <877gmkgogt.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20130204063905.GA23614@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <87wqun5037.fsf@gmail.com> <6207.1360048864@alphaville> <87fw1ashw5.fsf@gmail.com> <878v728fo0.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87ip65mfv5.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwvhkqye.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <8738x8mhkg.fsf@gmail.com> <37646106030B4CA98C6A7717FBD89D50@gmail.com> <87vca4jigj.fsf@gmail.com> <48826909C0A84E91B223EF0A33E7D721@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55033) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3SwJ-0000Ga-HV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 09:59:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3SwI-0008Pi-9V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 09:59:03 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::235]:37603) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3SwI-0008PZ-36 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 09:59:02 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id t44so2136786wey.12 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 06:59:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <48826909C0A84E91B223EF0A33E7D721@gmail.com> (Vincent Beffara's message of "Thu, 7 Feb 2013 15:49:19 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Vincent Beffara Cc: Org Mode List Vincent Beffara writes: > Sure, it should be in the default list. What is the drawback? The default list is defined in ox-latex.el, which doesn't know anything about ox-beamer.el. The drawback is that it doesn't seem clean to me. I think it's better to make it a fallback value hardcoded (or in a defconst) in ox-beamer.el instead. > Yes, I know that, but the thing is, from a given org-file, I would > expect beamer export to make the slides and 'plain' latex export to > create the handout. Maybe it is difficult to achieve but it feels like > the most useable setup. Is it at all doable? If the author is cautious about keywords used (i.e. #+BEAMER: or #+LATEX:), it should be possible to export the same document with either `beamer' or `latex' back-end. Though, I don't know how much difference there would be between the output from `latex' and a Beamer handout produced with "article" class. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou