From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Context of interaction vs. literal syntactic interpretation Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:12:55 +0100 Message-ID: <877g7jloyw.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8761o1n63t.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <8738j5snms.fsf@gmail.com> <87vbw11o3q.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ppm8rgrf.fsf@gmail.com> <87lhwwgqe4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <878uswqfzc.fsf@gmail.com> <87zjl9vjw4.wl@dns1.atmark-techno.com> <87ha7hpt6l.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqgdv48n.wl@dns1.atmark-techno.com> <87mwh9nf6h.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqgcka56.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87y50sn09o.fsf@gmail.com> <878ussk3c7.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87siqzhapq.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87wqgbtiff.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87txasc55f.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <871txvbsht.fsf@gmail.com> <877g7k7cmd.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38183) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS4lm-0000yL-T0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:19:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS4fz-0007DK-Qd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:12:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877g7k7cmd.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Sun, 23 Mar 2014 23:51:06 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Michael Brand , Matt Lundin , Org Mode Hello, Bastien writes: > In the meantime, what do you think about the solution I propose? I think it is a sensible move. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou