From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: org-review-schedule Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:14:35 +0200 Message-ID: <877g6leltk.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43940) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WbR81-0006Wr-2y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 05:00:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WbR7s-0003OF-2F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 05:00:05 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]:52792) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WbR7r-0003Ny-RY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 04:59:55 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hm4so282655wib.4 for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 01:59:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Alan Schmitt's message of "Fri, 18 Apr 2014 22:27:02 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alan Schmitt Cc: emacs-orgmode Hi Alan, thanks for sharing -- some comments: - you need to update the copyright of the file; - example code in section 3 of the header is mangled; - there are some dangling parentheses; - use (get-text-property (point-min) ...) instead of (get-text-property 1 ...) - I'd use org-review instead of org-review-schedule as prefix; - maybe you can use "naked" timestamps like 2014-04-19 sam. instead of inactive ones, this way using "[" in the agenda will not create false positives by inserting entries with a REVIEW property. - I infer from a quick read that this works for the agenda but I guess this could work for both the agenda and Org buffers; Since you took inspirationg from org-expiry, I guess some of the comments above would apply there too... feel free to hack into this directions for both org-expiry.el and org-review.el! Actually, maybe both should be merged somehow, since expiring is just reviewing entries to interactively delete them. Thanks for this! -- Bastien