From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Arntson Subject: Re: more from org-babel newbie Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:31:13 -0700 Message-ID: <877g68amtq.fsf@stevenarntson.com> References: <87bnvl9bfe.fsf@stevenarntson.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40344) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wexpb-0003NQ-Qm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 22:31:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WexpW-00065E-9L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 22:31:39 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:36132) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WexpW-000653-2T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 22:31:34 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WexpT-0003Kf-By for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 04:31:31 +0200 Received: from 75-165-123-102.tukw.qwest.net ([75.165.123.102]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 04:31:31 +0200 Received: from steven by 75-165-123-102.tukw.qwest.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 04:31:31 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > Aloha Steven, > > Steven Arntson writes: > >> The reason I'm excited to use org with lilypond files is the foldable >> headers *, **, *** etc, as well as drawers and tables. However, that's >> available only in an "org-mode" buffer, and I'm also wanting to use >> lilypond-mode, which gives excellent colored markup and indentation. How >> do I get the advantages of both? Or is that not even what I should be >> after? I may be fundamentally missing what's potentially useful about >> all of this for my musical use case! > > I haven't used babel for lilypond, but the usual way to edit a source > code block in the emacs mode for the language is to press C-c ' in the > source code block. > > hth, > Tom This is embarrassing ... I'd tried that and hadn't managed to get it to work, and now I realize I was using C-c ` and not C-c '. The devil is in the details. I'm still a little mystified about using org markup in the context of the lilypond file, but maybe now I can do a little more experimenting. Thank you! Steven