From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Jolitz Subject: Re: Exzessive newlines in org-element item interpreter? Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:30:45 +0200 Message-ID: <877fzv16tm.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87tx312j04.fsf@gmail.com> <87k33w36ci.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87vbng7cf3.fsf@gmail.com> <87k33w7aei.fsf@gmail.com> <87bnp82x9w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bnp86xmf.fsf@gmail.com> <87vbng0yuk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87fvekrmb6.fsf@gmail.com> <87r3y318fv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xg8Mu-00009y-Eo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 04:31:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xg8Ml-0003ud-95 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 04:31:08 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55258) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xg8Ml-0003uW-2h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 04:30:59 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xg8Mj-0000Wv-NZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:30:57 +0200 Received: from g231106164.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.231.106.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:30:57 +0200 Received: from tjolitz by g231106164.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:30:57 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Thorsten Jolitz writes: > >> ,----[ C-h f yes-or-no-p RET ] >> | yes-or-no-p is an alias for `y-or-n-p'. >> | >> | (yes-or-no-p PROMPT) >> | >> | Ask user a "y or n" question. >> `---- > > => nil > > The interpreter produces _normalized_ syntax. It ignores indentation, > capitalization on keywords and, obviously, specific bullets (which might > not be allowed in the target environment). This is a feature. Thanks for the answer. I did not mean to point fingers, I just wanted to know if it _can_ be done and I have to investigate further to find out how, or if I can save me the time and effort. PS Your interpretation of 'obvious' seems (obviously?) be a bit overly optimistic sometimes. -- cheers, Thorsten