From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: [ox, patch] Add #+SUBTITLE Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:17:26 +0800 Message-ID: <877fu8ms0p.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87a8z7z20k.fsf@gmx.us> <87k2y9m77m.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87oanl6o9j.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58944) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZqzr-000386-Pv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 21:17:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZqzo-0002BV-Hh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 21:17:39 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:58676) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZqzo-0002BN-BG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 21:17:36 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YZqzm-0001IS-Ge for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 02:17:34 +0100 Received: from 123.123.17.56 ([123.123.17.56]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 02:17:34 +0100 Received: from eric by 123.123.17.56 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 02:17:34 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> Rasmus writes: >> >> In ox-html, You might consider wrapping the title and subtitle in an >>
if :html5-fancy is t. Or maybe that's going too far! Either >> way, I like this. > > First result on my search engine says¹ : > > Update 16th April, 2013. hgroup has now been removed from the HTML5 > specification. We are working on an article to help guide authors on > which markup patterns they should use instead. > > Update 4th April, 2013. Please note that following this decision, > hgroup will be removed from the HTML5 specification. As such, we don’t > endorse using it on production sites. > > I don't know anything about html, though. Is there another element you > had in mind? Or is the html5doctor just wrong? Between me and html5doctor, I'd believe html5doctor. That's a shame though! hgroup always made a lot of sense to me.