From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Links
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 23:30:06 +0200
Message-ID: <877fr39w9t.fsf@selenimh.access.network>
References: <CAFgFV9N4p6V4K01gj-Eb-6KVTrFQ-f5bkXPKT2m4xn5hPxQJaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87wpz3akc4.fsf@selenimh.access.network>
	<CAFgFV9PkeQZQ=DMGivWj892cQbiL_3LqFbmJ0xcn18JE1o44SQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51452)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1Z4yPW-0004Co-Qp
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:28:47 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1Z4yPV-0002BX-DN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:28:46 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:34840)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1Z4yPV-0002BR-7K
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:28:45 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAFgFV9PkeQZQ=DMGivWj892cQbiL_3LqFbmJ0xcn18JE1o44SQ@mail.gmail.com>
	(Fabrice Popineau's message of "Tue, 16 Jun 2015 15:32:28 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Fabrice Popineau <fabrice.popineau@gmail.com>
Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Fabrice Popineau <fabrice.popineau@gmail.com> writes:

> Ideally, url encoded links should have been prefixed with some kind of uri
> syntax.
> This way, you could know what to decode and what not.

The encoded link could be copied from somewhere else. Also, there are
numerous links in the wild without this prefix.

> Now, I guess the heuristic you propose would be fine in most cases.
> I don't see that people will put a lot of percentages in their links.

I pushed something along these lines in master. It should solve your
initial issue.

Thank you.

Regards,