From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kyle Meyer Subject: Re: org-plus-contrib, where is library-of-babel.org? Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2017 17:24:11 -0400 Message-ID: <877ezh2tj8.fsf@kyleam.com> References: <87fue58v9p.fsf@gmx.us> <87a84d37me.fsf@kyleam.com> <8737a58hh8.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36950) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUJgg-00022v-1N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2017 17:24:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUJgb-00037j-O7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2017 17:24:18 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:51123 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUJgb-00037J-I0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2017 17:24:13 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD4F6E5AE for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2017 17:24:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3EF46E5AD for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2017 17:24:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [24.60.167.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 626986E5AC for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2017 17:24:12 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8737a58hh8.fsf@gmx.us> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > Kyle Meyer writes: [...] >> On the Emacs list, Glenn asked us to add a license to >> library-of-babel.org: >> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2017-07/msg00169.html > > Thanks, I missed that. > > Should I add the copyright header to Emacs repo and we backport it from > there, or is it better to add it via a forthcoming 9.0.10 update? Please make the change directly in the Emacs repo. That way the Emacs developers know it's been addressed, and we minimize the time that the file is in the Emacs tree without a copyright header. Thanks. -- Kyle