From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Scheme output results
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 10:52:50 +0200
Message-ID: <877eyzo7q5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <1498bbde-0912-a806-f665-47b6f8c5e6e4@ossau.homelinux.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56923)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1dZCdH-00073X-RI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 04:53:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1dZCdD-00033X-8r
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 04:52:59 -0400
Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]:38022)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1dZCdD-00032o-2J
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 04:52:55 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1498bbde-0912-a806-f665-47b6f8c5e6e4@ossau.homelinux.net> (Neil
	Jerram's message of "Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:06:37 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.homelinux.net>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.homelinux.net> writes:

> I don't think that Scheme output results are correctly handled. Please 
> consider:
>
> #+BEGIN_SRC scheme :results output
> (display "a") (newline)
> (display "b") (newline)
> (display "c") (newline)
> '(a b c)
> #+END_SRC
>
>
> #+RESULTS: : "a\nb\nc\n"
>
> As compared with the Elisp equivalent:
>
> #+BEGIN_SRC elisp :results output
> (princ "a") (terpri)
> (princ "b") (terpri)
> (princ "c") (terpri)
> '(a b c)
> #+END_SRC
>
> #+RESULTS:
> : a
> : b
> : c
>
> I have a possible fix for this - on another computer, so not to hand 
> right now - but thought it would be check first whether you agree with 
> me that the Scheme results should be more like the Elisp ones.

That sounds like a good idea. Could you send your fix as a proper patch
with a commit message?

Thank you!

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou