From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: where is org-table-toggle-column-visibility Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:59:04 +0100 Message-ID: <877eunre5z.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87h8tram9w.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53202) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eG1mD-0003Ei-KV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 06:59:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eG1m8-000150-VL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 06:59:13 -0500 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:42472) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eG1m8-00014R-Ou for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 06:59:08 -0500 Received: from saiph.selenimh (000043010000000000000469.ipv6.commingeshautdebit.fr [IPv6:2a03:a0a0:0:4301::469]) (Authenticated sender: mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FD63A80C2 for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:59:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from ngz by saiph.selenimh with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eG1m4-00052f-Ax for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:59:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87h8tram9w.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (Uwe Brauer's message of "Sat, 18 Nov 2017 11:55:55 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Uwe Brauer writes: > I am still running an old git version of org mode, > which I installed because there was a new function > org-table-toggle-column-visibility which is very important to me. > > However I thought of trying out the official 9.1.3 version. > > However, in that version either the function is gone, still not > implemented, or renamed. > > I recall a discussion about removing or rewriting this function but I > don't remember the conclusion. > > For me that is a *very* useful feature since from time to time I am > forced to deal with large table with a lot of columns, so that function > comes in handy. Could it be please reintroduced or maybe it was just > renamed? It in in master branch, so it will not be added before Org 9.2. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou