From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rutiger@gmx.de (=?utf-8?Q?R=C3=BCdiger?= Schierz) Subject: orgmode for requirement - feature - analysis Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2018 17:23:44 +0200 Message-ID: <877el06fwf.fsf@C18H4QO.dibuco.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53881) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fnQJW-0002Re-37 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2018 11:23:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fnQJQ-0006AF-HP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2018 11:23:54 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:55021) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fnQJQ-00069G-72 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2018 11:23:48 -0400 Received: from C18H4QO.dibuco.de ([88.67.139.205]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MdFwl-1fV4792zkx-00IScF for ; Wed, 08 Aug 2018 17:23:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Bostjan Vilfan's message of "Wed, 1 Aug 2018 12:42:03 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs orgmode Hi, I'm thinking about to use org-mode for running the requirement analysis and the feature design of a medium sized software project. Basically, I guess I would have a headline * Requirements containing subtitles/compositions of single requirements of the software under development. Then I would have the headline * Stakeholders which should be mapped to the requirements. A Stakeholder could be bound to one or more requirements.=20 The next headline would be a list/composition of * Features This is more or less the product backlog. The features would map to the requirements. A feature could be needed to resolve one or more requirements. Then there would be the headline to collect the * Tasks The tasks describe the work or action, which is necessary to implement the features. Thus there is also a mapping to one or more features. Tasks could also depend on other tasks. There will be an estimation of effort to run the tasks. This will determine the cost of the task and thus the cost of the features implemented by the tasks. Entering of attributes to the tasks, features and requirements could be done very well in tableview mode. A challenge would be, to check somehow, if all requirements would be solved by the features and all features would be solved by the tasks.=20 Question: Has somebody tried this already? Are there examples out there for such a use case? Cheers, R=C3=BCdiger