From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ken Mankoff Subject: Re: Babel eval w/ C-c C-c but not (org-babel-execute-buffer) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 08:04:09 +0200 Message-ID: <877e5d3zmu.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87o8yyj2oe.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42917) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iIRYe-0004Ws-Oc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 02:04:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iIRYc-0007rs-F0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 02:04:16 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]:43878) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iIRYa-0007rT-Vl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 02:04:14 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id u3so3400939lfl.10 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 23:04:12 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Cc: John Kitchin Hello, I think that even when ":eval no" is set, eval should happen if the user explicitly requests it. The use case is that I have code that takes an unreasonable amount of compute time to run it in Emacs (e.g. a full day of compute time). I think even with :async this type of code should be run outside of emacs, so I tangle it and run the python or bash scripts in a terminal. Elsewhere in the project (Org file) I have babel blocks that I want to update throughout the file. I do this by cleaning all result blocks with =C-u C-c C-v k= or (org-babel-remove-result-one-or-many), then executing all blocks (without =:eval no=) using =C-c C-v C-b= or (org-babel-execute-buffer). In order to not spend days of compute time when I eval (org-babel-execute-buffer), I set :eval no to the computationally heavy babel blocks. But during development it would be nice to run these... hence the conflict with the current Org behavior and my desire for a new feature. The two-line change at the bottom implements the following behavior: When the prefix arg is passed to org-babel-execute-src-block, the block is evaluated regardless of the :eval flag. Note that this doubles up on the prefix arg behavior, which is already set according to the documentation: > With prefix argument ARG, force re-execution even if an existing > result cached in the buffer would otherwise have been returned. Questions for the list: Is this feature something that makes sense? If yes, then do you also think that tangling should occur when explicitly requested (i.e. C-u C-c C-v C-t), even if :tangle no is set? Suggestions for a better implementation? Thanks, -k. diff --git a/lisp/ob-core.el b/lisp/ob-core.el index 572f97919..9f9add334 100644 --- a/lisp/ob-core.el +++ b/lisp/ob-core.el @@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ block." ;; Merge PARAMS with INFO before considering source block ;; evaluation since both could disagree. (cl-callf org-babel-merge-params (nth 2 info) params) - (when (org-babel-check-evaluate info) + (when (or arg (org-babel-check-evaluate info)) (cl-callf org-babel-process-params (nth 2 info)) (let* ((params (nth 2 info)) (cache (let ((c (cdr (assq :cache params)))) @@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ block." (let ((result (org-babel-read-result))) (message (replace-regexp-in-string "%" "%%" (format "%S" result))) result))) - ((org-babel-confirm-evaluate info) + ((or arg (org-babel-confirm-evaluate info)) (let* ((lang (nth 0 info)) (result-params (cdr (assq :result-params params))) ;; Expand noweb references in BODY and remove any