* Bug: "DEFINITION NOT FOUND" for footnote in Org manual @ 2021-07-11 8:29 Tim Landscheidt 2021-07-21 10:36 ` Timothy 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Tim Landscheidt @ 2021-07-11 8:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-orgmode At https://orgmode.org/manual/Export-Settings.html#DOCF124 and (renumbered to "fn:123") in doc/org-manual.org, a foot- note is defined as "DEFINITION NOT FOUND": | [tim@vagabond ~/src/org-mode]$ git grep -2 'DEFINITION NOT FOUND' -- doc/org-manual.org | doc/org-manual.org-this timestamp are exported. | doc/org-manual.org- | doc/org-manual.org:[fn:123] DEFINITION NOT FOUND. | doc/org-manual.org- | doc/org-manual.org-[fn:124] At the moment, some export back-ends do not obey this | [tim@vagabond ~/src/org-mode]$ The original footnote seems to have been added with commit e30aed8f0c62e74633f7a0398340f9bd7bdfa3cc (but personally I don't find that text very helpful). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: "DEFINITION NOT FOUND" for footnote in Org manual 2021-07-11 8:29 Bug: "DEFINITION NOT FOUND" for footnote in Org manual Tim Landscheidt @ 2021-07-21 10:36 ` Timothy 2021-07-21 15:21 ` Maxim Nikulin 2021-07-24 13:40 ` Tim Landscheidt 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Timothy @ 2021-07-21 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tim Landscheidt; +Cc: emacs-orgmode Hi Tim, > At https://orgmode.org/manual/Export-Settings.html#DOCF124 > and (renumbered to "fn:123") in doc/org-manual.org, a foot- > note is defined as "DEFINITION NOT FOUND": Well that certainly looks dodgy! > The original footnote seems to have been added with commit > e30aed8f0c62e74633f7a0398340f9bd7bdfa3cc (but personally I > don't find that text very helpful). Do you think it would be more appropriate to update or remove the footnote? -- Timothy ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: "DEFINITION NOT FOUND" for footnote in Org manual 2021-07-21 10:36 ` Timothy @ 2021-07-21 15:21 ` Maxim Nikulin 2021-07-21 15:26 ` Timothy 2021-07-24 13:40 ` Tim Landscheidt 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Maxim Nikulin @ 2021-07-21 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-orgmode On 21/07/2021 17:36, Timothy wrote: > >> At https://orgmode.org/manual/Export-Settings.html#DOCF124 >> and (renumbered to "fn:123") in doc/org-manual.org, a foot- >> note is defined as "DEFINITION NOT FOUND": > > Well that certainly looks dodgy! > >> The original footnote seems to have been added with commit >> e30aed8f0c62e74633f7a0398340f9bd7bdfa3cc (but personally I >> don't find that text very helpful). It seems, the footnote was unintentionally lost in the merge commit with a lot of conflicts due to renumbering in both branches: https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/commit/9410fbe0606a53b0582cc175b2cc525d556b23fe#diff-6498bd2213e2e527d904942bb214768a1913776L21749 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: "DEFINITION NOT FOUND" for footnote in Org manual 2021-07-21 15:21 ` Maxim Nikulin @ 2021-07-21 15:26 ` Timothy 2021-09-01 16:05 ` Maxim Nikulin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Timothy @ 2021-07-21 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maxim Nikulin; +Cc: emacs-orgmode Maxim Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> writes: > It seems, the footnote was unintentionally lost in the merge commit with a lot > of conflicts due to renumbering in both branches: > > https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/commit/9410fbe0606a53b0582cc175b2cc525d556b23fe#diff-6498bd2213e2e527d904942bb214768a1913776L21749 Many thanks for tracking that down! I'm inclined to just add back the text lost in that merge unless you'd recommend anything else. -- Timothy ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: "DEFINITION NOT FOUND" for footnote in Org manual 2021-07-21 15:26 ` Timothy @ 2021-09-01 16:05 ` Maxim Nikulin 2021-09-27 10:03 ` Bastien 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Maxim Nikulin @ 2021-09-01 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-orgmode On 21/07/2021 22:26, Timothy wrote: > Maxim Nikulin writes: > >> It seems, the footnote was unintentionally lost in the merge commit with a lot >> of conflicts due to renumbering in both branches: >> >> https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/commit/9410fbe0606a53b0582cc175b2cc525d556b23fe#diff-6498bd2213e2e527d904942bb214768a1913776L21749 > > Many thanks for tracking that down! I'm inclined to just add back the > text lost in that merge unless you'd recommend anything else. I think, it is better to restore the footnote text than to leave it in its current state "DEFINITION NOT FOUND". ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: "DEFINITION NOT FOUND" for footnote in Org manual 2021-09-01 16:05 ` Maxim Nikulin @ 2021-09-27 10:03 ` Bastien 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Bastien @ 2021-09-27 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maxim Nikulin; +Cc: emacs-orgmode Hi, Maxim Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> writes: > I think, it is better to restore the footnote text than to leave it in > its current state "DEFINITION NOT FOUND". Fixed now, thanks! -- Bastien ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: "DEFINITION NOT FOUND" for footnote in Org manual 2021-07-21 10:36 ` Timothy 2021-07-21 15:21 ` Maxim Nikulin @ 2021-07-24 13:40 ` Tim Landscheidt 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Tim Landscheidt @ 2021-07-24 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Timothy; +Cc: emacs-orgmode Timothy <tecosaur@gmail.com> wrote: > […] >> The original footnote seems to have been added with commit >> e30aed8f0c62e74633f7a0398340f9bd7bdfa3cc (but personally I >> don't find that text very helpful). > Do you think it would be more appropriate to update or remove the > footnote? AFAIUI, if LANGUAGE is set, for LaTeX export, org-latex-package-alist *must* also be set/amended, so the documentation of this relationship cannot be removed. But some other minor nitpicks with that setting (from a non- native speaker): | - =LANGUAGE= :: | #+cindex: @samp{LANGUAGE}, keyword | #+vindex: org-export-default-language | Language to use for translating certain strings | (~org-export-default-language~). With =#+LANGUAGE: fr=, for | example, Org translates =Table of contents= to the French =Table des | matières=[fn:122]. 1. "Certain strings" is true, but which ones are they? Without the second sentence, I couldn't imagine what strings the documentation is talking about. And does org-mode change user-supplied occurences of "Table of contents" to "Table des matières" as well? 2. Neither org-mode nor anything else is /translating/ (how?) those strings. Instead, one chooses the language for the name of the "Table of contents" section and others. | - =LANGUAGE= :: | #+cindex: @samp{LANGUAGE}, keyword | #+vindex: org-latex-package-alist | In order to be effective, the =babel= or =polyglossia= | packages---according to the LaTeX compiler used---must be loaded | with the appropriate language as argument. This can be accomplished | by modifying the =org-latex-package-alist= variable, e.g., with the | following snippet: | | #+begin_src emacs-lisp | (add-to-list org-latex-package-alist | '("AUTO" "babel" t ("pdflatex"))) | (add-to-list org-latex-package-alist | '("AUTO" "polyglossia" t ("xelatex" "lualatex"))) | #+end_src 3. General question: Why can't the requirement be automatic? E. g., if LANGUAGE != "en", use babel or polyglossia? 4. In org-latex-packages-alist (or org-latex-default-packages-alist), "AUTO" is not docu- mented, neither is OPTIONS in general. 5. My (rudimentary) understanding of LaTeX and babel & Co. is that one needs to use it with something like "\usepackage[english,german]{babel}". The first sentence ("be loaded with the appropriate language as argument") seems to confirm that. The second sentence says that "this" can be accomplished by the following snippet. However, there does not seem to be any argument that con- veys a language. Does that happen automatically? I. e., does the snippet actually accomplish what it claims to? (I haven't tested this.) Tim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-09-27 10:10 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-07-11 8:29 Bug: "DEFINITION NOT FOUND" for footnote in Org manual Tim Landscheidt 2021-07-21 10:36 ` Timothy 2021-07-21 15:21 ` Maxim Nikulin 2021-07-21 15:26 ` Timothy 2021-09-01 16:05 ` Maxim Nikulin 2021-09-27 10:03 ` Bastien 2021-07-24 13:40 ` Tim Landscheidt
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).