Hi Everyone, Just letting you know that on my blog TMIO (This Month In Org) I've just published the July post. I've decided to focus entirely on citations this time :) Should this be of interest, here it is: https://blog.tecosaur.com/tmio/2021-07-31-citations.html Enjoy! -- Timothy
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 499 bytes --] On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 04:29:09AM +0800, Timothy wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Just letting you know that on my blog TMIO (This Month In Org) I've just > published the July post. I've decided to focus entirely on citations > this time :) > > Should this be of interest, here it is: > https://blog.tecosaur.com/tmio/2021-07-31-citations.html Wow. Thanks! (Note that I'm not the target audience of this feature, but I'm nevertheless enjoying thoroughly your blog post!) Cheers - t [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
Hi Timothy,
Timothy writes:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Just letting you know that on my blog TMIO (This Month In Org) I've just
> published the July post. I've decided to focus entirely on citations
> this time :)
>
> Should this be of interest, here it is:
> https://blog.tecosaur.com/tmio/2021-07-31-citations.html
Thank you very much for this comprehensive and very useful post: the
best way to start my summer vacation! :-)
And many thanks to those who have developed this interesting and
promising new Org feature.
Best regards,
Juan Manuel
Hello Timothy, >>>>> Timothy <tecosaur@gmail.com> writes: > Hi Everyone, Just letting you know that on my blog TMIO (This > Month In Org) I've just published the July post. I've decided to > focus entirely on citations this time :) > Should this be of interest, here it is: > https://blog.tecosaur.com/tmio/2021-07-31-citations.html Nice work. For me, however, I'm still at a loss, although I confess I've not kept up to-date with the org citation developments. 1. I don't understand the relation between the new cite syntax and the old org-mode [[ bib:key ]]. Perhaps there isn't one. 2. How is an =org-link-abbrev-alist= related to a global and/or local #+bibliography:? Even if I remove reference to my =org-link-abbrev-alist= the org-export (to pdf) still does not find a different local bibliography file. (I have org-cite-global-bibliography set to nil.) I think I need to read the manual! Anyway, thanks to everyone for this new org citation. Best wishes, Colin.
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 794 bytes --] Hi Colin, > Nice work. For me, however, I’m still at a loss, although I confess I’ve > not kept up to-date with the org citation developments. > > 1. I don’t understand the relation between the new cite syntax and the old > org-mode . Perhaps there isn’t one. > > 2. How is an `org-link-abbrev-alist' related to a global and/or local > #+bibliography:? Even if I remove reference to my `org-link-abbrev-alist' > the org-export (to pdf) still does not find a different local bibliography > file. (I have org-cite-global-bibliography set to nil.) I think the confusion you have lies in the similarity between the link syntax and cite syntax — the new `[cite:@key]' citations are *not* links. Hopefully that makes them a this a bit clearer :) All the best, Timothy
>>>>> Timothy <tecosaur@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Colin,
>> Nice work. For me, however, I’m still at a loss, although I
>> confess I’ve not kept up to-date with the org citation
>> developments.
>>
>> 1. I don’t understand the relation between the new cite syntax
>> and the old org-mode . Perhaps there isn’t one.
>>
>> 2. How is an `org-link-abbrev-alist' related to a global and/or
>> local #+bibliography:? Even if I remove reference to my
>> `org-link-abbrev-alist' the org-export (to pdf) still does not
>> find a different local bibliography file. (I have
>> org-cite-global-bibliography set to nil.)
> I think the confusion you have lies in the similarity between the
> link syntax and cite syntax — the new `[cite:@key]' citations are
> *not* links. Hopefully that makes them a this a bit clearer :)
Ah! Now that's helpful - thanks.
Does anyone know when this might land in Emacs’ master branch?
R+
Timothy <tecosaur@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Just letting you know that on my blog TMIO (This Month In Org)
> I've just published the July post. I've decided to focus
> entirely on citations this time :)
>
> Should this be of interest, here it is:
> https://blog.tecosaur.com/tmio/2021-07-31-citations.html
>
> Enjoy!
>
> -- Timothy
>
--
Logic is a science of the necessary laws of thought, without which
no employment of the understanding and the reason takes place. --
Immanuel Kant, 1785 Rudolf Adamkovič <salutis@me.com>
Studenohorská 25 84103 Bratislava Slovakia [he/him]
Most of the functionality described in the piece is already in the
master branch.
best regards,
András
On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 at 12:36, Rudolf Adamkovič <salutis@me.com> wrote:
>
> Does anyone know when this might land in Emacs’ master branch?
On Tuesday, 3 Aug 2021 at 12:10, András Simonyi wrote: > Most of the functionality described in the piece is already in the > master branch. No, not quite. These latest updates are in the master branch of org mode but they have not yet been incorporate into the master branch of Emacs itself. -- : Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4.6-607-g185706 : Latest paper written in org: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05096
Absolutely, thanks for the correction -- I meant Org's master, even
though the question was clearly about Emacs's.
best regards,
András
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 at 12:23, Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 3 Aug 2021 at 12:10, András Simonyi wrote:
> > Most of the functionality described in the piece is already in the
> > master branch.
>
> No, not quite. These latest updates are in the master branch of org
> mode but they have not yet been incorporate into the master branch of
> Emacs itself.
>
> --
> : Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4.6-607-g185706
> : Latest paper written in org: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05096