* is it possible to choose a completion engine?
@ 2023-05-20 21:08 Tory S. Anderson
2023-05-22 13:05 ` Ihor Radchenko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tory S. Anderson @ 2023-05-20 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: orgmode list
Org currently stands out from my workflow because it does completions its own way, with lists and number/letter keys. It would be nice if I could instead have the benefit of vertico, or helm, or whatever else instead. Org would even benefit from marginalia and embark in some cases. Is there an easy variable I'm missing to make org use completing-reads instead of the indexing thing it does?
Thanks!
- Tory
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: is it possible to choose a completion engine?
@ 2023-05-22 6:13 Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez @ 2023-05-22 6:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Org Mode List, webdev@toryanderson.com
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1017 bytes --]
Tory writes:
> Org currently stands out from my workflow because it does completions its
own way, with lists and number/letter keys. It would be nice if I could
instead have the benefit of vertico, or helm, or whatever else instead. Org
would even benefit from marginalia and embark in some cases. Is there an
easy variable I'm missing to make org use completing-reads instead of the
indexing thing it does?
Hi Tory,
I'm using company-mode and I do have auto-completions without any specific
org configuration. Org is also quite well integrated with jinx as my
spellchecker. Since I mainly use org as a 'high-level' layer for
presentations and documents, I'm well served with that. And it is basically
the same I have for LaTEX and markdown.
Hope it helps,
/PA
--
Fragen sind nicht da, um beantwortet zu werden,
Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden
Georg Kreisler
Headaches with a Juju log:
unit-basic-16: 09:17:36 WARNING juju.worker.uniter.operation we should run
a leader-deposed hook here, but we can't yet
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1423 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: is it possible to choose a completion engine?
2023-05-20 21:08 is it possible to choose a completion engine? Tory S. Anderson
@ 2023-05-22 13:05 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-05-23 1:26 ` Samuel Wales
2023-05-23 18:45 ` Tory S. Anderson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ihor Radchenko @ 2023-05-22 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tory S. Anderson; +Cc: orgmode list
webdev@toryanderson.com (Tory S. Anderson) writes:
> Org currently stands out from my workflow because it does completions its own way, with lists and number/letter keys. It would be nice if I could instead have the benefit of vertico, or helm, or whatever else instead. Org would even benefit from marginalia and embark in some cases. Is there an easy variable I'm missing to make org use completing-reads instead of the indexing thing it does?
This is because you customized your tags/todo keywords to have a quick
key binding to set. By default, Org uses custom "fast" interface for
completion in such cases. You can either remove the bindings to
explicitly set `org-use-fast-tag-selection' and/or
`org-use-fast-todo-selection' to nil.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: is it possible to choose a completion engine?
2023-05-22 13:05 ` Ihor Radchenko
@ 2023-05-23 1:26 ` Samuel Wales
2023-05-23 14:41 ` Tory S. Anderson
2023-05-23 18:45 ` Tory S. Anderson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Wales @ 2023-05-23 1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ihor Radchenko; +Cc: Tory S. Anderson, orgmode list
i guess menu selection is a kind of completion and frameworks coud be
used also. a big thing for me that works with ido and ido-hacks and
ido-clever-match is olpath completion for refile-goto and refile.
On 5/22/23, Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> wrote:
> webdev@toryanderson.com (Tory S. Anderson) writes:
>
>> Org currently stands out from my workflow because it does completions its
>> own way, with lists and number/letter keys. It would be nice if I could
>> instead have the benefit of vertico, or helm, or whatever else instead.
>> Org would even benefit from marginalia and embark in some cases. Is there
>> an easy variable I'm missing to make org use completing-reads instead of
>> the indexing thing it does?
>
> This is because you customized your tags/todo keywords to have a quick
> key binding to set. By default, Org uses custom "fast" interface for
> completion in such cases. You can either remove the bindings to
> explicitly set `org-use-fast-tag-selection' and/or
> `org-use-fast-todo-selection' to nil.
>
> --
> Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
> Org mode contributor,
> Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
> Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
> or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
>
>
--
The Kafka Pandemic
A blog about science, health, human rights, and misopathy:
https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: is it possible to choose a completion engine?
2023-05-23 1:26 ` Samuel Wales
@ 2023-05-23 14:41 ` Tory S. Anderson
2023-05-24 0:03 ` Samuel Wales
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tory S. Anderson @ 2023-05-23 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Samuel Wales; +Cc: Ihor Radchenko, orgmode list
Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> writes:
> i guess menu selection is a kind of completion and frameworks coud be
> used also. a big thing for me that works with ido and ido-hacks and
> ido-clever-match is olpath completion for refile-goto and refile.
Thank you for the recommendation! I've never tried ido, having gone from Helm to Avy/Ivy to Selectrum to Vertico. IIRC, ido is built in to emacs, right? So that would be a big plus. It sounds like it finds a sweetspot for you.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: is it possible to choose a completion engine?
2023-05-22 13:05 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-05-23 1:26 ` Samuel Wales
@ 2023-05-23 18:45 ` Tory S. Anderson
2023-05-24 10:06 ` Ihor Radchenko
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Tory S. Anderson @ 2023-05-23 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ihor Radchenko; +Cc: orgmode list
Ah! Turns out I rely on the Fast completion more than I realized; I am used to hitting "t p" from the agenda to tag an item with a custom status I've created, as you guessed in your message. But untouched was the type of key-menu I really want to hide when, for example, I hit =C-c a= =org-agenda= and get a menu of agenda options to choose from, or =(org-clock-goto '(4))= and I get a big indexed list of clock items. I don't mind keeping the fast keys, but would love for the big screens of options to go away. The =org-use-fast-todo-selection= and =org-use-fast-tag-selection= variables do not effect the method used for those big index screens, which are the ones I actually care about and would like to use with standard completion.
Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:
> webdev@toryanderson.com (Tory S. Anderson) writes:
>
>> Org currently stands out from my workflow because it does completions its own way, with lists and number/letter keys. It would be nice if I could instead have the benefit of vertico, or helm, or whatever else instead. Org would even benefit from marginalia and embark in some cases. Is there an easy variable I'm missing to make org use completing-reads instead of the indexing thing it does?
>
> This is because you customized your tags/todo keywords to have a quick
> key binding to set. By default, Org uses custom "fast" interface for
> completion in such cases. You can either remove the bindings to
> explicitly set `org-use-fast-tag-selection' and/or
> `org-use-fast-todo-selection' to nil.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: is it possible to choose a completion engine?
2023-05-23 14:41 ` Tory S. Anderson
@ 2023-05-24 0:03 ` Samuel Wales
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Wales @ 2023-05-24 0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tory S. Anderson; +Cc: Ihor Radchenko, orgmode list
[well it does not work on some cmpleting-reads now in 27.1, and melpa
seems to be unsigned, so if i am able i have to upgrade a component,
try a different ido package perhaps, or try vertico and friends....
but yes it was a sweet spot.]
On 5/23/23, Tory S. Anderson <webdev@toryanderson.com> wrote:
> Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> i guess menu selection is a kind of completion and frameworks coud be
>> used also. a big thing for me that works with ido and ido-hacks and
>> ido-clever-match is olpath completion for refile-goto and refile.
>
> Thank you for the recommendation! I've never tried ido, having gone from
> Helm to Avy/Ivy to Selectrum to Vertico. IIRC, ido is built in to emacs,
> right? So that would be a big plus. It sounds like it finds a sweetspot for
> you.
>
--
The Kafka Pandemic
A blog about science, health, human rights, and misopathy:
https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: is it possible to choose a completion engine?
2023-05-23 18:45 ` Tory S. Anderson
@ 2023-05-24 10:06 ` Ihor Radchenko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ihor Radchenko @ 2023-05-24 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tory S. Anderson; +Cc: orgmode list
"Tory S. Anderson" <webdev@toryanderson.com> writes:
> ... But untouched was the type of key-menu I really want to hide when,
> for example, I hit =C-c a= =org-agenda= and get a menu of agenda
> options to choose from, or =(org-clock-goto '(4))= and I get a big
> indexed list of clock items. I don't mind keeping the fast keys, but
> would love for the big screens of options to go away.
These two are hard-coded for now.
See `org-agenda-get-restriction-and-command' and
`org-clock-select-task'. Patches welcome!
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-05-24 10:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-05-20 21:08 is it possible to choose a completion engine? Tory S. Anderson
2023-05-22 13:05 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-05-23 1:26 ` Samuel Wales
2023-05-23 14:41 ` Tory S. Anderson
2023-05-24 0:03 ` Samuel Wales
2023-05-23 18:45 ` Tory S. Anderson
2023-05-24 10:06 ` Ihor Radchenko
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-05-22 6:13 Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).