From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: circufix notation for inline
 and  styling
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 13:24:53 +0100
Message-ID: <8764j9p59m.fsf@tallis.ilo.ucl.ac.uk>
References: <44859356.6030900@gmail.com>
	<8c5eb813a5b3cfa54394191d35241654@science.uva.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: 
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fp2WP-0003Rc-Fc
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 08:24:57 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fp2WO-0003Qe-JU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 08:24:56 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fp2WO-0003QJ-BJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 08:24:56 -0400
Received: from [62.241.163.6] (helo=astro.systems.pipex.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fp2ee-0007qN-Rl
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 08:33:29 -0400
Received: from tallis.ilo.ucl.ac.uk (85-210-155-65.dsl.pipex.com
	[85.210.155.65])
	by astro.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674EEE00008A
	for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 13:24:55 +0100 (BST)
In-Reply-To: <8c5eb813a5b3cfa54394191d35241654@science.uva.nl> (Carsten
	Dominik's message of "Tue, 6 Jun 2006 16:49:52 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." 
List-Unsubscribe: ,
	
List-Archive: 
List-Post: 
List-Help: 
List-Subscribe: ,
	
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Carsten Dominik  writes:

>> While I'm at it, is strike-through possible?
>>
>>     -event- was canceled
>
> I think this one is a bit too likely to occur in a non-intended way, a
> different syntax would be needed, and I am willing to implement it
> (even though strike-through is another one of those markups I would
> never use because I think they could cause an eye injury :-)

What about "+event+"? or ~event~? I think this is less likely to occur
then -event-.  BTW, "++event++" is already in use in some wiki syntax
for strike-through (see wikka wiki).

Strike-through is quite useful when editing a blog entry.  I can see
many occurrences of people using it in some +cynic+ ironical way...

Regards,

-- 
Bastien