From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tassilo Horn Subject: Re: undo and folding Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:44:50 +0100 Message-ID: <8763mchn0d.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <20524da70811241144qf6c40fcpe8245642975ff3c6@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L4iJt-0000rV-Ls for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:46:09 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L4iJr-0000pp-LA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:46:08 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54374 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L4iJr-0000ph-Fi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:46:07 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:39337 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L4iJq-0006I6-QL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:46:07 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L4iJf-0007gt-CM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:45:55 +0000 Received: from p54af070e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([84.175.7.14]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:45:55 +0000 Received: from tassilo by p54af070e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:45:55 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org "Samuel Wales" writes: Hi Samuel, > Very often, I will hit undo, only to find that all of the changes it > makes are hidden in a folded subtree. That happens to me quite often, too. > Combined with the lack of a non-buggy true redo, this makes things > very confusing. Where is emacs' redo buggy? Any non-undo command after undo followed by undo will undo your latest undo. Isn't that easy? > Is there a way to fix this? I guess you could add a before advice to `undo', that calls `show-all'. Bye, Tassilo