From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Rose Subject: Re: Re: Org-mode version 6.30trans (release_6.30d.5.gc125); make fails on org-ascii.el Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 22:06:07 +0200 Message-ID: <8763bvvnww.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87k50fdk7d.fsf@gmx.de> <877hwfq6m8.fsf@gmx.de> <172E8752-1404-4B90-91ED-4B98A44A2914@gmail.com> <6ac505ad0909041954g25dce8eel73b793d38faa10b@mail.gmail.com> <878wgtfu2n.fsf@fastmail.fm> <6ac505ad0909050606t46d818cbwbf596ab958d453a3@mail.gmail.com> <73804EFE-DDE3-4E27-BE75-F80BD7714F21@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MkO06-0001S7-Bs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:06:14 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MkO02-0001N3-Sd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:06:14 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41891 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MkO02-0001Mq-P8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:06:10 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:44068) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MkO02-0006L7-1t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:06:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <73804EFE-DDE3-4E27-BE75-F80BD7714F21@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Sun, 6 Sep 2009 13:41:19 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik writes: > On Sep 5, 2009, at 3:06 PM, Daniel Martins wrote: > >> Is it not possible to pu tsome directive in the Makefile in order to make >> >> check the presence of *.elc without corresponding *.el and deleting them >> BEFORE or simultaneously with recompilation process? >> >> It should improve the compilation process. >> >> Maybe it could be create a new directive such as >> >> make clean-install >> >> to keep make install with backward compatibility. > > There is already the "update" target... That should be enough :) Thank's for the hint. (I should have done a `grep -F clean Makefile'....) Sebastian