From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Re: packaging org-mode & worg Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 01:16:04 +0200 Message-ID: <8763163dqj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mxumuguf.fsf@yahoo.it> <20100625093606.GA25258@upsilon.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55034 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OSI8H-00067L-8Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:16:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSI8F-0001Qp-P1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:16:24 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:63875) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSI8F-0001Qi-L2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:16:23 -0400 Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so1515551wwf.0 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:16:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100625093606.GA25258@upsilon.cc> (Stefano Zacchiroli's message of "Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:36:06 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org I don't think it's a good idea to integrate a Worg snapshot into Org's distribution: too much maintenance trouble for little convenience. Org's documentation already refers to Worg in some places: maybe we just need to have more references like these, and a more thorough description of what Worg is? I also like the idea of a debian package for Worg - this cannot hurt and might advertize the project quite widely. -- Bastien