From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: [ANN] List improvement v.2 Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:16:42 +0100 Message-ID: <8762ympx1h.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> References: <87ocdzw7gq.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <43BA920D-4EA2-4C51-B941-33A60D097EB3@gmail.com> <87wrr3b4r3.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> <87aanyc2v7.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> Reply-To: e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Multipart_Fri_Sep__3_18:16:42_2010-1" Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50990 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Orb9M-0006sK-PB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:38:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Orb9K-00031x-Vr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:38:08 -0400 Received: from vscane-a.ucl.ac.uk ([144.82.108.41]:37369) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Orb9K-00031r-Rk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:38:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87aanyc2v7.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Org Mode List , Carsten Dominik --Multipart_Fri_Sep__3_18:16:42_2010-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:34:36 +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Hello, > >>>>> Eric S Fraga writes: > > > One quick problem I have run into today: > > > org-toggle-checkbox (C-c C-x C-b) doesn't seem to do anything now? I > > have to put in the checkboxes manually. > > I cannot reproduce it on git head. If you were inserting non-existing > checkboxes, I guess you meant C-u C-c C-x C-b. I must be dreaming... I am *sure* that, until yesterday or today, I have always used C-c C-x C-b to insert a checkbox if none were present; at least, that's what my fingers tell me and they have a better memory than my head... I have always used C-c C-c to actually mark or unmark the checkbox. Have the default bindings changed? In any case, apologies for the noise but maybe I can suggest a change to the default? C-c C-c already does an excellent job of checking/unchecking a checkbox so it would be nice if C-c C-x C-b would do as I thought it did: insert a checkbox if not present. Is this a reasonable or desirable behaviour? Just a thought. Thanks, eric --Multipart_Fri_Sep__3_18:16:42_2010-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII -- Eric S Fraga GnuPG: 8F5C 279D 3907 E14A 5C29 570D C891 93D8 FFFC F67D --Multipart_Fri_Sep__3_18:16:42_2010-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode --Multipart_Fri_Sep__3_18:16:42_2010-1--