emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org>
To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Question about org-new-numbered-item
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:44:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8762qz2vtx.fsf@fastmail.fm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C03AC000-A640-4683-87E7-D334E362342A@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:45:54 +0200")

Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:

> On Mar 31, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Matt Lundin wrote:
>
>> Hi Carsten,
>> 
>> I noticed you have added a new function to org.el called
>> org-new-numbered-item, which inserts items like this:
>> 
>> * TODO Action #1                                :#1:
>> * TODO Action #2                                :#2:
>> 
>> I'd be curious to learn more about possible uses for this feature. For
>> instance, if one reorganizes items, will the actions be renumbered?
>
> No.  The purpose is exactly to have the old numbers retained
> when moving and reorganizing them - a task not well served
> by ordered lists.

Great. That makes sense. Thanks!

>> Thanks in advance for entertaining these questions born of
>> brainstorming and curiosity!

> Maybe you can first look at the tutorial which explains how
> I am using this.  The function was added to minimize setup
> required for this particular use case.
>
> http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-meeting-tasks.html
>
> When you have read this, I am happy to brainstorm more about this
> and see if there are other contexts where this might be useful.

Very informative and thorough. Thanks for sharing your workflow here!

I should have checked Worg first, knowing how efficiently and thoroughly
you get things done. :)

When I saw the new functions I thought they might be the beginnings of a
more generalized syntax for creating enumerated headlines. After reading
the tutorial, I think a better description would be "helper functions
that support a workflow for taking meeting notes." I.e., the incremental
tags are not part of "official" org-mode syntax in the same way that,
say, priority cookies are. I can also see how automatic renumbering
would not be helpful in this context.

Best,
Matt

      reply	other threads:[~2011-03-31 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-31 13:31 Question about org-new-numbered-item Matt Lundin
2011-03-31 13:45 ` Carsten Dominik
2011-03-31 14:44   ` Matt Lundin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8762qz2vtx.fsf@fastmail.fm \
    --to=mdl@imapmail.org \
    --cc=carsten.dominik@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).