Eden Cardim <edencardim@gmail.com> writes:

>     Tassilo> No, I just wasn't really sure what that SCAN argument
>     Tassilo> means, so I tried to be as safe as possible.  If it's
>     Tassilo> always safe to provide nil, let's change that.
>
> Well, right now all it does is to check split rules against incoming
> mail. But, if we have a link to a message in org, then that message
> already went through the split process, so re-splitting is
> unnecessary.

Ok, so here we go: