From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [BUG] crash while ping-ponging between back-to-back footnotes. Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:29:44 +0200 Message-ID: <8762nn203r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <81hb78n9i8.fsf@gmail.com> <87mxh06a5s.fsf@gnu.org> <81y60k4tj0.fsf@gmail.com> <87pqlwbkmk.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52722) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcCcf-0002by-OO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 04:29:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcCce-0004vw-3t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 04:29:17 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:44704) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcCcd-0004vp-Iq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 04:29:15 -0400 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so1691237wyg.0 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 01:29:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87pqlwbkmk.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:41:39 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Jambunathan K Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Jambunathan K writes: > >>> Both fontification and export get confused if footnotes are not >>> separated with a space -- I think it's okay to live with this >>> one-space-between-footnotes policy, but I let Nicolas decides. >> >> Since [fn:2] is automagically added by C-c C-x f may be it can check for >> an immediately preceding footnote and DTRT (inserting space or whatever >> the preference is) if it is not done already. > > I'm a bit confused. I still fail to see what is wrong about the current > behavior in master branch. AFAICT, two or more footnotes side-by-side > are correctly handled. Yes, they are now. Thanks! -- Bastien