emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* [babel] Call lines with "their own" results
@ 2012-03-22  8:24 Andreas Leha
  2012-03-26 10:57 ` Eric Schulte
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Leha @ 2012-03-22  8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: emacs-orgmode

Hi all,

Is there a way to force #+call line to have their own results block?
Or what is the best practice to achieve that?
I remember that there was a thread on this recently...

Example:
#+name: sampleblock
#+begin_src R :colnames yes
  data.frame(par=1, val=1)
#+end_src

I can call this block:
#+call: sampleblock()

#+results: sampleblock()
| 1 | 1 |

Now, I want to call this block with different arguments, but instead
of placing the results here, the result block above gets updated.
#+call: sampleblock() :colnames yes



Note: I can cheat to achieve this, but is this the best way?
#+call: sampleblock(execute="!")  :colnames yes

#+results: sampleblock(execute="!")
| par | val |
|-----+-----|
|   1 |   1 |

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [babel] Call lines with "their own" results
  2012-03-22  8:24 [babel] Call lines with "their own" results Andreas Leha
@ 2012-03-26 10:57 ` Eric Schulte
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric Schulte @ 2012-03-26 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andreas Leha; +Cc: emacs-orgmode

Hi Andreas,

Currently call the behavior you mention below, in which call line
results are named by their arguments and are not unique, is the
implemented behavior.  I agree that it would be preferable to switch to
a system in which each call line was given it's own results, however I
am not able to make this change right now (although it is on my TODO
list).

I think for now a workaround like the one you suggest below (or maybe
using an "id" header argument) is probably your best bet.

Best,

Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> Is there a way to force #+call line to have their own results block?
> Or what is the best practice to achieve that?
> I remember that there was a thread on this recently...
>
> Example:
> #+name: sampleblock
> #+begin_src R :colnames yes
>   data.frame(par=1, val=1)
> #+end_src
>
> I can call this block:
> #+call: sampleblock()
>
> #+results: sampleblock()
> | 1 | 1 |
>
> Now, I want to call this block with different arguments, but instead
> of placing the results here, the result block above gets updated.
> #+call: sampleblock() :colnames yes
>
>
>
> Note: I can cheat to achieve this, but is this the best way?
> #+call: sampleblock(execute="!")  :colnames yes
>
> #+results: sampleblock(execute="!")
> | par | val |
> |-----+-----|
> |   1 |   1 |
>
>
>

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-26 14:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-22  8:24 [babel] Call lines with "their own" results Andreas Leha
2012-03-26 10:57 ` Eric Schulte

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).