From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: tangle multiple code blocks belonging to the same file
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:59:05 +0100
Message-ID: <87621euo86.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <CAAp=d8oaNynE5Ti1bJb+PJRL=s9jDp=PedE7DCHfQD-aF9-yQw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58192)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1UAcr5-0003JE-Ms
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:59:26 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1UAcqx-0008V5-FR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:59:15 -0500
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:61002)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1UAcqx-0008Ut-7F
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:59:07 -0500
Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id hm14so331647wib.4
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:59:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAp=d8oaNynE5Ti1bJb+PJRL=s9jDp=PedE7DCHfQD-aF9-yQw@mail.gmail.com>
	(Not To Miss's message of "Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:41:00 -0700")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Not To Miss <not.to.miss@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, schulte eric <schulte.eric@gmail.com>

Hi Zech,

Not To Miss <not.to.miss@gmail.com> writes:

> I know C-u C-c C-v t tangles current code block only, even if there
> are other code blocks that have the same tangle file name. Isn't it
> counterintuitive? It makes more sense that this command tangles all
> the code blocks that belongs to the same file, in my opinion. Any
> other ideas?

Maybe `C-u C-u C-c C-v t' could tangle blocks from the same target
file, so that we don't need to change users' habits with `C-u C-c C-v t'.

But for now IIURC it is not possible to collect blocks for the same
target file.  I think it would be a very nice addition.

Eric, would that be difficult to implement?  Or maybe I miss it in the
code and we just need a keybinding for this?

Thanks for the suggestion,

-- 
 Bastien