From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dieter Wilhelm Subject: Some %elements in org-html-postamble-format became too "generous" Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:52:46 +0200 Message-ID: <8761zyzhf5.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50580) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UOo9n-00081v-C1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 07:53:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UOo9i-0003Tq-2S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 07:53:11 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c01::236]:37124) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UOo9h-0003TL-Sd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 07:53:05 -0400 Received: by mail-ea0-f182.google.com with SMTP id q15so1847946ead.27 for ; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 04:53:04 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Dear list, before 8pre it was better possible to translate the Org/Emacs information in the postamble. If I'm using ("fr" "

Auteur: %a (%e)

\n

Date de la modification: %d

\n

Produit par %c

\n") The result looks like: Produit par Generated by Org mode 8.0-pre in Emacs 24.3.3 which also contradicts the documentation string of org-html-postamble-format... By the way, I think the creation Time (%T) capability of the postamble is rather pointless, could you please change it to the modification time or add something (like %C)? This would save the hassle of putting everywhere #+DATE: {{{modification-time(%Y-%m-%d)}}} into the files. One could just change the %d to %C... Moreover, I think the documentation string is not really precise about the creation time. We have on Linux atime, mtime and ctime (Access, Modification and in effect the inode "Change" time), probably the modern file systems store additionally the "true Creation" time. Above nitpicking is only meant for supporting my request with the modification time. :-) -- Thank you Dieter Best wishes H. Dieter Wilhelm Darmstadt Germany