From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bug in new exporter with babel blocks
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 21:32:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8761zhkngr.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87liahsfk2.fsf@gmail.com> (Aaron Ecay's message of "Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:11:09 -0500")
Hello,
Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com> writes:
> 2013ko urtarrilak 23an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen:
>> You needn't. org-exp-blocks functionalities are supported by the new
>> exporter out of the box.
>
> Can you say more about this? I looked for but did not find a
> replacement to the org-export-blocks variable (an alist associating
> block types with functions to export them). I found it very easy to
> hook into the new exporter, but perhaps I missed something?
No, you didn't miss anything. I was thinking about
`org-special-blocks.el'. The exporter doesn't implement org-exp-blocks
functionalities.
Though, IIRC, org-exp-blocks was mostly deprecated when Babel was
introduced. That's why old ditaa and dot "exp-blocks" were moved to src
block languages.
> For parsing, yes. But for export I want a way to say “I don’t care what
> Org thinks the export of this block is. Give me the raw contents, and I
> will tell you what the export should be.”
>
> This is how the ditaa special-block code used to work; I see that it has
> now morphed into a babel language, which makes some kind of sense. I’m
> not sure it does in general.
>
> My use case is glossed examples for linguistics: my special block
> contains three lines, which are a sentence in a foreign language and a
> translation. By inserting markup in a way which is easy to automate,
> you can get LaTeX to align the words of one language with the words of
> the other. I don’t want any org processing of the text of the examples:
> it might contain backslashes, stars, etc., all of which should be passed
> verbatim to LaTeX. This does not feel like source code, it cannot be
> evaluated or tangled, I would not want these blocks to be included in
> org-babel-next-src-block, etc.
It is data. Source code is for the processing function.
Anyway, just store your text in example blocks, and create a src block
in any language to do the processing. Then you can call the processing
function on all of your example blocks.
I suggest to keep the example blocks in a non-exportable section. You
can also remove all named example blocks before export, via a hook. Your
call.
#+begin_src org
* Data :noexport:
#+name: words
#+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
a b c
#+END_EXAMPLE
#+name:
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :var x=words
(upcase x)
#+END_SRC
* Contents
#+call: words(:var x=words)
#+end_src
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-20 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-22 21:54 Aaron Ecay
2013-01-23 13:28 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-02-21 18:11 ` Aaron Ecay
2013-04-20 19:32 ` Nicolas Goaziou [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8761zhkngr.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=n.goaziou@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--subject='Re: Bug in new exporter with babel blocks' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).