From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: plain lists folded by default Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:12:05 -0500 Message-ID: <8761ouv87e.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> References: <52D68750.2020408@parisdescartes.fr> <87fvopxa2g.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <52F1376A.8040303@parisdescartes.fr> <87ha8evcdx.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> <52F15D77.5090301@parisdescartes.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54338) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAoEE-0007dr-Ea for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:12:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAoE7-0007jk-8y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:12:26 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:56858) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAoE7-0007je-2N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:12:19 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WAoE5-0007KL-UW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 23:12:17 +0100 Received: from nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com ([66.187.233.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 23:12:17 +0100 Received: from ndokos by nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 23:12:17 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rémy Abergel writes: > Maybe it is due to the fact I "replied to all" from one of my old > messages, deleting the content and changing the email subject :'-( That would do it :-) > You mean I should have started from a blank email right? > Yes. > Well sorry for that, and thank you again for your answers. > No problem (as long as you don't it again :-) ) Nick