From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Lundin Subject: Re: [FeatReq] New option for `org-entry-properties' WHICH argument? Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 21:52:59 -0500 Message-ID: <8761jnukqc.fsf@fastmail.fm> References: <87ha37jrip.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36443) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0MHj-0000iB-Ka for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 22:53:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0MHd-0003AJ-Lh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 22:53:07 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:59364) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0MHd-0003AE-E3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 22:53:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ha37jrip.fsf@gmail.com> (Thorsten Jolitz's message of "Thu, 26 Jun 2014 23:21:50 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Thorsten Jolitz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Thorsten Jolitz writes: > Hi List, > > what about adding one more option for WHICH > > ,----[ C-h f org-entry-properties RET ] > | org-entry-properties is a compiled Lisp function in `org.el'. > | > | (org-entry-properties &optional POM WHICH SPECIFIC) > | [...] > | If WHICH is nil or `all', get all properties. If WHICH is > | `special' or `standard', only get that subclass. If WHICH > | is a string only get exactly this property. SPECIFIC can be a string, the > | specific property we are interested in. Specifying it can speed > | things up because then unnecessary parsing is avoided. > `---- > > that would filter out all Org related properties, i.e. the properties > the system itself uses, and thus return only the application related > properties? > > E.g. option 'non-org' [..] > > What do you think? +1 It would help in extracting user data when such data is interspersed with org properties (e.g., LAST_REPEAT). Matt