From: Thorsten Jolitz <tjolitz@gmail.com>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Collecting unique selling proposition (USP) of Org-mode
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 09:14:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8761iopmwt.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CFF4EC75.1E729%Elwood151@web.de
M <Elwood151@web.de> writes:
>> Von: Karl Voit <devnull@Karl-Voit.at>
>> Organisation: www.karl-voit.at
>> Antworten an: Karl Voit <news1142@Karl-Voit.at>
>> Datum: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 21:07:32 +0200
>> An: <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
>> Betreff: Re: [O] Collecting unique selling proposition (USP) of Org-mode
>>
>>> I think the best thing to compare different tools is making a list with
>>> features and mark which tools support which ones.
>>> I assume there is already such a list
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_personal_information_managers
>
> OK, the list is there, but it is not comparing features directly.
>
> A very good example is the features comparison of docear with some of its
> alternatives:
> http://www.docear.org/2014/01/15/comprehensive-comparison-of-reference-manag
> ers-mendeley-vs-zotero-vs-docear/
#+begin_quote
A while ago, Mendeley was acquired by Elsevier for an estimated
69-100 Million Dollars.
#+end_quote
wow
If Org-mode is better than Mendeley (which I don't know at all), then
its worth a fortune ;)
--
cheers,
Thorsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-23 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-28 11:43 Collecting unique selling proposition (USP) of Org-mode Karl Voit
2014-06-28 12:51 ` M
2014-06-28 13:13 ` Karl Voit
2014-06-28 13:40 ` M
2014-06-28 14:14 ` M
2014-06-28 14:23 ` Karl Voit
2014-06-29 5:04 ` David Masterson
2014-06-29 5:55 ` M
2014-08-04 14:37 ` Sebastien Vauban
2014-06-28 13:41 ` Rainer M Krug
2014-06-28 13:59 ` M
2014-06-28 14:28 ` Karl Voit
2014-06-28 14:52 ` M
2014-07-01 19:07 ` Karl Voit
2014-07-23 2:37 ` M
2014-07-23 7:14 ` Thorsten Jolitz [this message]
2014-07-23 22:40 ` M
2014-06-28 18:02 ` Melleus
2014-07-27 17:53 ` Bastien
2014-07-28 19:56 ` Thorsten Jolitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8761iopmwt.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=tjolitz@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).