From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: Exponents / subscripts Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:23:21 +0200 Message-ID: <8761fenzxi.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87zjcs0yxw.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k33v13g5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgLMb-0006Hh-4Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 18:23:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgLMV-0004A4-PS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 18:23:41 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:32887) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgLMV-00049z-JG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 18:23:35 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XgLMU-00077C-Dn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:23:34 +0200 Received: from 109.201.154.187 ([109.201.154.187]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:23:34 +0200 Received: from rasmus by 109.201.154.187 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:23:34 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Fabrice Popineau writes: > >> Given that it is only a matter of presentation, does that mean it could be >> changed ? >> If yes, I can try to give it a shot. > > If you mean that a^bc should be equivalent to a^{b}c, then I think it is > superior in its current state. As I understand Fabrice's mail, it's only about display of scripts in Org buffers (when org-pretty-entities-include-sub-superscripts is non-nil). So rather than displaying (+) \(a^nb^n\) as \(aⁿᵇⁿ\) it would be displayed as (*) \(aⁿbⁿ\) Of course, it /only/ makes sense to change how it is displayed in math-mode, for which (*) is the more accurate depiction of (+). If what was indeed what Fabrice had in mind I think it makes sense. But I also have been bothered by how (+) is displayed in the past. . . —Rasmus -- I hear there's rumors on the, uh, Internets. . .