From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: org-html-use-unicode-chars breaks source code blocks Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 12:57:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87614r2wow.fsf@gmx.us> References: <871tfjq7mb.fsf@gmx.us> <87zj26gart.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87zj23h168.fsf@gmx.us> <87egjftmd4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49219) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNfKo-0004a1-6K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 06:57:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNfKj-0003QN-Mg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 06:57:10 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:50399) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNfKj-0003Q6-CL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 06:57:05 -0400 Received: from W530 ([91.64.37.213]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MFLhE-1ZZoQe268y-00EQ0u for ; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 12:57:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87egjftmd4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Fri, 07 Aug 2015 12:37:59 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> OK. I added it to plain-text as well. What is an example of a plain-text >> that would need beautification? > > To tell the truth, I don't know why we need beautification in the first > place. Bastien introduced it, so he may be able to answer. To this extend; me neither. But Vladimir uses it to "leave IRIs as IRIs" (I don't know what this means). >> Should we apply it to snippets as well? In the spirit of "beautification" >> it would make sense, but it could also seem like a bad choice. > > I think it makes sense to apply it to snippets, indeed, but see above. My initial reaction was to kill it as well. But I might feel like this a bit to often (I feel the same way about headline keywords like COMMENT). Rasmus -- 9000!