From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. " References: <87lgd671k7.fsf@bzg.fr> <87o9i2p9qq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87k1sq6znz.fsf@bzg.fr> <871seyp6fr.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874lju6tap.fsf@bzg.fr> <87bme1y7ft.fsf@gmail.com> <87sh7d1upr.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53058) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fF0p1-0003hN-C1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2018 13:18:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fF0ox-00010A-Ct for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2018 13:18:11 -0400 Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=36008 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fF0ox-0000z2-6A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2018 13:18:07 -0400 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fF0mk-000455-10 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2018 19:15:50 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > Hi Tim, > > thanks for your thorough and balanced feedback. > > Tim Cross writes: > >> There is no solution which will make everyone happy. However, as a long >> term org user who hopes to continue using org for many more years, I >> tend to come down on the side of whatever will make org easier to >> maintain in the long term. > > For org-tempo, Rasmus wrote it so I'm inclined to listen quite > carefully at his opinion. Please don’t. I have not really made any policy decisions of sort. I only missed " ... > In fact, I'm inclined to ask the real question: if org-tempo is on by > default, who will have good reasons to turn it off and why? I certainly won’t be :) Rasmus -- However beautiful the theory, one should occasionally look at the evidence