From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id GCsqEM1u7WH+eQEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:05:49 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id YGiYDc1u7WG7BwAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:05:49 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4E52EFBE for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:05:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:38228 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBeR9-0000ci-E5 for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 10:05:47 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35340) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBeNQ-0000cT-QB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 10:01:56 -0500 Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.30]:55030) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBeNF-0002yt-2L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 10:01:56 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C00D163FC; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:01:37 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bernoul.li; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from:received :received; s=sel2011a; t=1642950095; bh=rLv5W+WG46fC4SF4gfZGghaD GMIwA7dOFe6KZ7rbJPg=; b=S2CYKbIp2gFTrbewLkI2gg8i97+QqgsjLtQq5U/X 0bMhOC1f9CtL9DX2qg6MRxjC95NabDx4cJa63F9HARmBBDwKcU0ZPx+oWV/mIAK9 NXNwGchSo3zpnG0opIvcZK+3hAbqufz9ZIDIm0sU7iF7ui1EgcfM/u+DFgNLpJqM 7H8= X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 21ZRdsJM0v3m; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:01:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6AA59163CB; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:01:35 +0100 (CET) From: Jonas Bernoulli To: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ox-texinfo: Turn a description list item with "+" bullet into @itemx In-Reply-To: <87ee5u77mr.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87pmqhmvg1.fsf@bernoul.li> <20211218214038.9459-1-jonas@bernoul.li> <20211218214038.9459-2-jonas@bernoul.li> <87wnjr9he9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87zgol7wkz.fsf@bernoul.li> <87ee5u77mr.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:01:35 +0100 Message-ID: <875yqajy28.fsf@bernoul.li> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: none client-ip=212.243.197.30; envelope-from=jonas@bernoul.li; helo=mail.hostpark.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kyle@kyleam.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1642950348; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=HUet333WHcNx2VIaNdirBT6+lXaE18znPfEYzG/z5Po=; b=EE3buLtxKmp99KbEhy0kwQqUQ6420nHz6Uphv57zaM7BLvJDZvBBrekLbO1voJ979nBCMi H3lzFA3auhCwbv7R9PFuVDRfmlN096uhjJIadXdjrpFtlXVjNKw5R3AcWlvuca+GBcPhzh wJC5Zar+CnRZx25/EbTra9E0ewQwZD6DnNAa37hhH6chA9TMeNsNxIljz9yz9eaiJIwTvY bMamQl9N7j2nLzuEyjJDXNytpL+XSRC0xAO6ZAWePySXSzXskJ4aiw3pKooEQOw0ku825w Q9dR49FmzdHqlZytwKyEj57tGBl74GC0CTP70sT5QkKpvbDa7gcqRapfvfm4Dw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1642950348; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=uXLEb0mRRfp0DNujgzNW0ZZO8UM7PxxVFuKJ7f0+MGD9VXklQmi0BkjN73kgbK/D6hpqVh ZK1ziNmxsbDfnG7P6eiWcgqCE6Uref+Z06aTUxvvRznehBOpYMXliXmRKNFEjO4q0us8W8 KF7KvB6nzM36jNHDnwIBCOgwFt/hTsrHIdsQKu0AJtE0joGELnx5mK8N02Z7lnt9nXYYXk 8AtG3nctnDqVuW9/EUumeulAKFELYdCTQVoWiFHszRN66ogQ8p99vihfOkFsadhK3uWTf7 qNgTw79io66iCZL+onxB0WcBonP7JwiZldsIXoz/MjQjxB82745uMbPsNYLlbA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=bernoul.li header.s=sel2011a header.b=S2CYKbIp; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.23 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=bernoul.li header.s=sel2011a header.b=S2CYKbIp; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: C4E52EFBE X-Spam-Score: -5.23 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: zi5e/M1y84H6 Nicolas Goaziou writes: > I suggest to require a special attribute before doing so, e.g., > > #+attr_texinfo: :compact t > - key: a :: > - key: b :: > > - key: c :: > - key: d :: I have noticed that I accidentally called it ":combine" in the documentation and have fixed that. (Do you think we should stick to ":compact"?) I would actually prefer to be able to set this once per file, not least because this looks a bit weird. #+attr_texinfo: :compact t - key: a :: not "compact" - key: c :: - key: d :: "compact" > Another option would be to merge consecutive lists with such an > attribute, for the same result: > > #+attr_texinfo: :compact t > - key: a :: > - key: b :: > > #+attr_texinfo: :compact t > - key: c :: > - key: d :: That would seem like a fix for that issue, but as I mentioned before that doesn't work because it results in two lists, each with one @item and one @itemx. You actually suggested that in your first reply: >> #+TEXINFO_DEFFN: t > The chosen UI is rather odd however. I cannot think of another use of > controlling export thhough "#+keyword: boolean" syntax. Usually, we > extend the "options" keyword. It could become, for example: > > #+options: texinfo+:t > > Could it be possible to use that syntax instead? You later indicated that you would prefer to specify this per-list. I implemented the approach that uses "+" to indicate @itemx items, because that seemed even nicer to me (because more explicit) but you didn't like that and so I went with the alternative that you suggested in response to that attempt. But I would like to take a step back and ask if > #+options: texinfo+:t still seems like a good idea to you. (If so, should that be used instead of the per-list approach or as an alternative?) Jonas