From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tassilo Horn Subject: Re: Re: Bug if `org-refile-use-outline-path' is set to 'file Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:03:00 +0200 Message-ID: <874ox6cdob.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <87myb0hknz.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <24B2D0E7-807E-47C3-89C3-8BE9ACC5A38C@gmail.com> <878wmki5j2.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <19EA0B1A-957C-4B60-8741-D2F3345F14C1@gmail.com> <87hc17h4ab.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <52CAAE2C-DC0C-4532-AF71-7704763B44FD@gmail.com> <87d4bunb0j.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <1259075F-77C6-4C28-B8B5-87FA94E41FF6@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LpfIt-0001H1-2g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 05:03:11 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LpfIn-0001E1-LK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 05:03:09 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43825 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LpfIn-0001Dy-GK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 05:03:05 -0400 Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:56138) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LpfIm-00055G-Ui for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 05:03:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1259075F-77C6-4C28-B8B5-87FA94E41FF6@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:49:22 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik writes: Hi Carsten, >> Done that, and this line of my .emacs broke the completion: >> >> (setq completion-styles (remove 'basic completion-styles)) >> >> After deleting it, I can complete in steps as it should be. > > What reason did you have to add this line in the first place? > Just curious. Some time ago completion didn't seem to do partial completion if basic was in that list. Now I tried again and it seems to work fine even with basic in it. Bye, Tassilo