From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Re: More conspicous header lines Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:36:11 +0200 Message-ID: <874ot3tyvo.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <877hy09xjw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87hbx3n6ci.fsf@gmail.com> <87ocrb4wn8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTwb7-0006WA-Fv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 07:36:29 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTwb1-0006VL-Ew for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 07:36:27 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34149 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MTwb0-0006V0-Sr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 07:36:22 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.246]:57621) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MTwb0-0008Gy-Hf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 07:36:22 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so356676rvb.6 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:36:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (User's message of "Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:20:07 +0000 (UTC)") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: User Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org User writes: > Bastien googlemail.com> writes: > >> > >> > What are we voting for, to make this *possible* or *default*? >> >> Default. > > > This may mislead some people. Adding this fix wouldn't change how > headers look by default. It would only make it possible to draw > header lines across the screen *if* the user sets a background > color for the header which is not usually the case, so it > wouldn't affect the average user if he doesn't want it. Yes, thanks for precising this. > Anyway, if we want to be super cautious then I recommend an > option for controlling this. If the option is set then the \xa is > added to the header regexp, otherwise not. I think I will take this road, yes. -- Bastien