From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lukasz.stelmach@iem.pw.edu.pl Subject: Re: Sending org-mode nodes Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:56:49 +0100 Message-ID: <874ooqty72.fsf@dasa3.iem.pw.edu.pl> References: <87aayjaih8.fsf@dasa3.iem.pw.edu.pl> <873a4a29ce.wl%maus.david@gmail.com> <87hbsqu86y.fsf@dasa3.iem.pw.edu.pl> <87skca93a9.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NB7VQ-0008O0-DB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:57:05 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NB7VL-0008LC-DG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:57:03 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45671 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NB7VL-0008L7-4s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:56:59 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:51068) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NB7VK-0002cI-Jv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:56:58 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NB7VE-00042I-Jq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:56:52 +0100 Received: from dasa3.iem.pw.edu.pl ([194.29.147.110]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:56:52 +0100 Received: from lukasz.stelmach by dasa3.iem.pw.edu.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:56:52 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Sebastian Rose writes: > lukasz.stelmach@iem.pw.edu.pl writes: >> David Maus writes: > //....// >> - Message-ID derived from node's ID. This would be quite useful for >> associating replies with original notes/nodes. > > > In that case, each mail sent from the subtree would have the same > message-ID, which is invalid, since the ID is made to identify a certain > email. It's supposed to be world wide unique for at least two years. > > Your provider would replace your (probably invalid) ID anyway. I've written *derived* which means org--- also fits. Right? >> These are of course my whishful thoughts, especially the one with >> Old-Sent-To. I think, however, that org-mode with them implemented would >> be even greater tool than it is today. > > > I believe it's not implemented, because it's easy to just > > C-c @ > C-x m > Enter addresses (bbdb helps a lot here) > DOWN DOWN DOWN DOWN > C-y > evtl. edit the contents > C-c C-C Which only proves that it is possible to do it automatically. > There's simply no need to implement it for Gnus users. > Emacs+Org+bbdb+Gnus implement it already. How about attachments? How, at least, to get their full paths into kill ring? Wether we like it or *not* some things can't be done in pure text/plain. Putting a headline as a subject (with or without tags) makes it even better as well as stripping any drawers (leading stars?). From the very beginning I assumed there is a way of doing what I need just right now but I described some enhancements that make work even less troublesome. Imagine: C-c C-x m (org-send-node e.g.) C-c C-c would be possible for a well prepared node (bbdb link stored as a property). What makes nodesending even more appealing to me is that I can have my emails (at least some of them) well organized with org (and git) and attached to other things I do. -- Miłego dnia, Łukasz Stelmach