From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Rose Subject: Re: What license for Worg? Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 14:33:54 +0200 Message-ID: <874ofay2tp.fsf@gmx.de> References: <874ofd19fd.fsf@altern.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54435 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OgdAE-0000d3-KM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:33:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgdAD-0004ot-Et for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:33:42 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:45471 helo=mail.gmx.net) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgdAD-0004oR-1s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:33:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <874ofd19fd.fsf@altern.org> (Bastien's message of "Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:33:10 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-org list Hi Bastien, Bastien writes: > Hi all, > > what is the most suitable license (or licensing scheme) for Worg? > > Here is the best solution I can think of: dual-licensing[1] under the > GNU Free Documentation License 1.3[2] and the Creative Commons BY-SA > 3.0[3] license. This solution would make it possible to take excerpts > from Worg and put them into Org manual for later inclusion in Emacs, > which uses GFDL 1.3 for the Emacs manual. I'm OK with wathever licensing is neccessary to support Org mode and Emacs. Sebastian