From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:14:08 +0100 Message-ID: <874ob7hvv3.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> References: <87zkvhoh18.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87fwx5c98w.fsf@gmail.com> <87sk14p6y6.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87mxrbdyhs.fsf@gmail.com> <87tylfsd7h.fsf@mundaneum.com> <4C9D1196.8030309@gmail.com> <87r5gfppob.fsf@mundaneum.com> <8039qxmojd.fsf_-_@mundaneum.com> <4CE694F1.2050409@christianmoe.com> <8039qx3wff.fsf@missioncriticalit.com> <87mxp5q6uf.fsf@gmail.com> <80ipzrzmts.fsf@missioncriticalit.com> <87eiaeiyk8.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <80ipzpw16v.fsf@missioncriticalit.com> <878w0jj0wa.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <80zkszlj6t.fsf@missioncriticalit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52361 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PLCQV-00013u-IQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 05:18:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PLCMq-0000TJ-Gk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 05:15:49 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:60878) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PLCMq-0000Sl-8i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 05:14:24 -0500 Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so3250488ewy.0 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 02:14:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <80zkszlj6t.fsf@missioncriticalit.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?B?U8OpYmFzdGllbg==?= Vauban Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, >>>>> Sébastien Vauban writes: > I meant, for me, there are only 2 useful options regarding a "block > environment" such as BLOCKQUOTE and VERSE: > - either, nothing is "interpreted"; that is, line breaks are > preserved, and lists are preserved as well (outputted as they are > written in the block) This is EXAMPLE environment and, in a less drastic way, VERSE (patched). > - either, line breaks are not preserved, and lists are nicely > formatted as lists, with nice bullets in HTML/PDF (customized in CSS > or class file). This is QUOTE environment, almost. Lists are correctly exported, but not recognized in the Org buffer. > For me, as of now, I do not see a useful use case, where one would > want to have line breaks preserved (as written in the source block) > *but* lists interpreted (ie, not as written in the source block). I agree. So, if the patch for VERSE is good, what's left is to let Org recognize lists in some predefined environments (namely CENTER and QUOTE). Regards, -- Nicolas