From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Org tiny changes? Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 10:28:38 +0200 Message-ID: <874ns2j2k1.fsf@altern.org> References: <86bombjk4m.fsf@mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42563) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOQeS-0001HK-RB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 05:42:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOQeQ-0005aV-5Z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 05:42:44 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:35745) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOQeP-0005a4-TH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 05:42:42 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id ds1so1494548wgb.30 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:42:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86bombjk4m.fsf@mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Fran=E7ois?= Pinard"'s message of "Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:24:09 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Pinard Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi François, François Pinard writes: > * It now seems that UNDER\_LINE, while producing HTML, is now rendering > the backslash instead of removing it. The backslash was previously > required so "LINE" is not shown as a subscript for "UNDER". Today, if > I use UNDER_LINE, it gets rendered as is, without the need of a > backslash. Can you give us a hint on what versions you're comparing here? > * Whenever a date is generated (through "C-c !" say) or adjusted, the > day of the week has a period appended. That is, where I was > previously getting "[2012-04-28 sam]", I now get "[2012-04-28 sam.]". IIRC, this is a change in calendar. But you don't need to update your old timestamps, Org understands them. > P.S. I installed Ubuntu 12.04 on a fresh partition today, and observed > the changes after the fact (and after having re-installed Org from Git). > This is probably a mere coincidence, I would not be tempted to think the > upgrading of Ubuntu has a consequence on the Org changes I'm seeing. Please give us raw version numbers. Thanks! -- Bastien